Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
In that perception, case legislation differs from 1 jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in Big apple would not be decided using case legislation from California. Alternatively, The big apple courts will assess the issue relying on binding precedent . If no previous decisions around the issue exist, Ny courts may examine precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority relatively than binding authority. Other factors for example how outdated the decision is plus the closeness to the facts will affect the authority of the specific case in common legislation.
Also, it could review an appeal of a decision for which it's got granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts In case the Commission cannot reach a decision.
The official court record is maintained because of the court of record. Copies of case file documents are usually not readily available over the search site and will need to be ordered from the court of record.
However it is made very clear that police is free to take action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities topic to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused towards the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also make sure regard of the family get rid of in accordance with law and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security of your house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition is achieved. For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated earlier mentioned. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, whilst it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it's actually very obscure about whether the ninety-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based about the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held for the ninety-working day notice requirement, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there could exist conflicts between the various decreased appellate courts. Sometimes these differences may not be resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is usually a nicely-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of your Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is just not served, the read more grievance petition is often dismissed. This is because service from the grievance notice can be a mandatory requirement and also a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation demands that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits may be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.
The different roles of case law in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the way in which that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale at the rear of their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the wider legal principles.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have listened to the discovered counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession from the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the topic premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.